<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Service Dogs For Veterans Act” Passes The Senate, But What Does That Mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.albrittain.com/service-dogs/service-dogs-for-veterans-act-passes-the-senate-but-what-does-that-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.albrittain.com/service-dogs/service-dogs-for-veterans-act-passes-the-senate-but-what-does-that-mean/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:27:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: susan b. oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.albrittain.com/service-dogs/service-dogs-for-veterans-act-passes-the-senate-but-what-does-that-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1998</link>
		<dc:creator>susan b. oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.albrittain.com/?p=1465#comment-1998</guid>
		<description>I was very excited about the introduction of a Service Dogs for Veterans Act, until I read the text.  I was bitterly disappointed to read that the Act provides only for the Director of Veterans Affairs to conduct a three year research program into the advisability of providing service dogs for disabled veterans.  

How useless!  What the veterans require, and are certainly entitled to, are effective, viable resources offered to them which assist their rehabilition and return to private life immediately. We need funding for the training of the dogs, and a placement program put in place immediately!

I am going to devote my time to the attempt to link the needs of the soldiers with the resources of the available trainers.  Our dog shelters are filled with dogs who would be a tremendous asset for our deserving veterans if properly trained and placed. 

A &quot;pilot&quot; program of inquiry is a ridiculous waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very excited about the introduction of a Service Dogs for Veterans Act, until I read the text.  I was bitterly disappointed to read that the Act provides only for the Director of Veterans Affairs to conduct a three year research program into the advisability of providing service dogs for disabled veterans.  </p>
<p>How useless!  What the veterans require, and are certainly entitled to, are effective, viable resources offered to them which assist their rehabilition and return to private life immediately. We need funding for the training of the dogs, and a placement program put in place immediately!</p>
<p>I am going to devote my time to the attempt to link the needs of the soldiers with the resources of the available trainers.  Our dog shelters are filled with dogs who would be a tremendous asset for our deserving veterans if properly trained and placed. </p>
<p>A &#8220;pilot&#8221; program of inquiry is a ridiculous waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.albrittain.com/service-dogs/service-dogs-for-veterans-act-passes-the-senate-but-what-does-that-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.albrittain.com/?p=1465#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Scott,

The legislation was passed as part of the FY2010 Omnibus Appropriations Act and signed into law by the President on Dec 16th.

Implementation is another matter, though.  Although most people who&#039;ve written about this legislation act as if its funding and passage make it a done deal, the reality is there is still a lot to be sorted out.  I know there are people working on that, but don&#039;t know exactly where things stand today.

Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>The legislation was passed as part of the FY2010 Omnibus Appropriations Act and signed into law by the President on Dec 16th.</p>
<p>Implementation is another matter, though.  Although most people who&#8217;ve written about this legislation act as if its funding and passage make it a done deal, the reality is there is still a lot to be sorted out.  I know there are people working on that, but don&#8217;t know exactly where things stand today.</p>
<p>Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott wasmund</title>
		<link>http://www.albrittain.com/service-dogs/service-dogs-for-veterans-act-passes-the-senate-but-what-does-that-mean/comment-page-1/#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>scott wasmund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.albrittain.com/?p=1465#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>where does this legislation stand, as of today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where does this legislation stand, as of today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
